Skip to content. Skip to navigation
Personal tools
Texas A&M University
 
Home TEX: Taxonomy for Education and eXploration Management & Budget Risk Management & Risk Assessment The Department of Homeland Security’s Risk Assessment Methodology: Evolution Issues, and Options for Congress
Document Actions

The Department of Homeland Security’s Risk Assessment Methodology: Evolution Issues, and Options for Congress

Title:   The Department of Homeland Security’s Risk Assessment Methodology: Evolution Issues, and Options for Congress

Date: February 2, 2007

Author:  Todd Masse, Siobhan O’Neil, John Rollins

Institution:  GAO

Bibliographic Entry
:  Todd Masse, Siobhan O’Neil, John Rollins. “The Department of Homeland Security’s Risk Assessment Methodology: Evolution Issues, and Options for Congress.” GAO. February 2, 2007. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RL33858.pdf (Accessed January 30, 2008).

Electronic Link
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RL33858.pdf

Key Words:  risk assessment methodology, Department of Homeland Security, DHS, grants

Summary of Key Points, Issues, Conclusions:

DHS has adopted a strategy of priorities driven by risk.  However, while risk analysis is advanced in the insurance and financial sectors, it is relatively less developed for homeland security.  This report overviews the evolution of risk assessment methodologies from the Department of Justice in FY 2002 to DHS in FY 2007.  Risk assessment has evolved from a simplistic formula equating risk with population to a much more robust calculation of weighted threat, vulnerability, and consequence variables.  However, regardless of the complexity of the risk assessment methodology, due to the inherent uncertainties associated with assessing risk in a dynamic counterterrorism context, some level of flexibility in managing risk may be necessary.

The report also presents several risk assessment and related grant program options for congressional consideration:
1.    Status quo – linked areas of risk assessment and grant allocation
2.    National impact assessment – returns on investment of grant money
3.    Transparency enhancement – risk allocation methodology at state and local levels
4.    Development of comprehensive and long-term strategy for managing, assessing, and mitigating risk

Discussions and possible approaches for achieving goals entail the final section.

Name of Researcher: Katie Stout

Institution:
Integrative Center for Homeland Security, Texas A&M University

Date Posted
:  February 5, 2008